Free to Choose,
Open to Seek:
Religious Liberty from a Theravada Buddhist Perspective
by Mahinda Deegalle
Buddhism celebrates liberty. In every sense of the
word, liberty is the trademark of Buddhist doctrine, practices,
and institutions in its long legacy of spread from India to the
south to Sri Lanka, to the north to Tibet, to the east to China,
and recently to the west to Europe and North America.
Buddhist doctrines discuss three forms of liberty: (i) liberty
of thought, (ii) liberty of speech, and (iii) liberty of action.
Among these three connected phases, thought or conscience
is the driving force in the Buddhist conceptualization of liberty,
since both speech and action are formed and shaped by initial
thoughts and intentions of the human person. All three expressionsthought,
speech, and actionneed to be based on the basic principles
of dhamma (law) in which one avoids any harmful impact on any
sentient being.
Liberty in all sorts of human expression is encouraged and recognized
because of the acceptance of individual variations, inclinations,
preferences, and spiritual potential. Liberty is connected to
and dependent upon particular social, religious, economic, historical,
and doctrinal factors and ingredients. Ones liberation is
often envisioned in the context of ones subjectivity. In
a profane sense, one can experience liberty in this world as freedom
from various oppressions and exploitations, and in a sacred sense,
when one attains to the status of the fully awakened one.
Though religious it is, Buddhist liberation, however,
should not be viewed as completely disconnected with ethical,
moral, and religious life in this world. Life in this messy world
can be instrumental in leading one to the freedom from bondage.
The Buddhist vision of liberty is firmly grounded in its perception
of reality as a penetrating comprehension of the things
as they are in the world, that all conditioned
things are impermanent, subject to suffering and selfless.
The recognition of human liberty is an attempt to allow each individual
to come to terms with the facts of life, which underpin our lives.
A realistic penetration to the way things are in the world liberates
each individual to be free from bondage that surrounds us by dragging
us into various conflicts, acts of violence, and persecution in
which one dispossesses another human persons right to the
free exercise of freedom.
Buddhism accepts individual variation. It adopts strategies that
are suitable for each individual. Rather than imposing a totalitarian
regime on each individual, Buddhism maintains that each individual
should pursue an efficient course of action for ones own
liberation in ones own phase.
The celebration of human freedom runs through Buddhist practices,
institutions, and doctrines. Human beings are free to choose their
own course of action for achieving liberation. Religious teachings
should not prevent human beings from taking individual action
for their liberation.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 1) asserts:
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and
rights. The Buddhist view of human rights and religious
liberty arises from the conviction that human beings are born
with complete freedom and responsibility. The historical Buddha
strongly affirmed that human beings have their destiny in their
hands. Emphasizing self-reliance of each individual, human equality
in dignity and rights is clearly recognized. Buddhist texts such
as the Sampasadaniya Sutta (D.III.113) stress the importance of
personal effort, human endeavour, strength, and responsibility.
The Buddhahood itself is open to all human beings without any
limitation.
The fundamental Buddhist ethical principle that underpins the
concept of human rights is that all life forms have a basic
desire to safeguard themselves. This ethical perspective
gives validity and strength to the principle of universal love
(metta) advocated by all Buddhists. Buddhist texts assert this
crucial ethical standpoint in various ways: for example, the Dhammapada
states that all beings desire happiness (10:3) and
that life is dear to all living beings (10:2). This
Buddhist ethical position further proposes to compare ones
situation with that of another and avoid resorting to violence
and depriving another of its right to life. From this Buddhist
perspective, the ideal life is one in which one lives with
friendliness and compassion towards all beings (D.I.70).
As in many other world religions, there is no doubt that Buddhist
teachings also can be drawn to support the view that religious
liberty is firmly grounded on a conception of the dignity of the
human person. In addition, however, Buddhist doctrines maintain
that the free exercise of will is the key for both
material and spiritual wellbeing of the human person who is free
to choose and open to seek an individual programme of religious
regiment that enables each individual to taste the pleasures of
liberation.
Thus, Buddhism can be characterized as
an eternal search for freedom. This recognition of human freedom
forms the basis of Buddhist practice and ideology that shaped the
cultures in Asia that came under Buddhist influence. The best illustration
of this unconditional acceptance and recognition of liberty and
human freedom is found in one of the most important Pali canonical
discourses. In the Kalama Sutta (A.I.189), the Buddha advises Buddhists
how they should design their religious enquiry by transcending any
biases that come into play when human persons make critical decisions
in adopting a religious tradition or practice. The historical Buddha
advised the Kalamas (a group of critically-minded people) not
to accept anything on the grounds of revelation, tradition, or hearsay,
not to accept because they are mentioned in the collections
of the scriptures or because they are based on reasoning or because
they are in accordance with logical arguments or because they conform
with ones own preconceived notions or because of inadequate
reflection on them or because they fit to a context or because of
the prestige of your teacher (A.I.189).*] The historical Buddhas
provoking statement here is an illustration of religious freedom
that the Buddha himself advocated in relation to his own teachings
as well as those of other religious teachers.
This understanding of validity and acceptance of the other and tolerance
towards non-Buddhist practices is not just an ideology invoked by
Buddhists in public platform. Ideals shaped by these valuable religious
insights have been translated into Buddhist practices and polities
in pre-modern Sri Lanka. Two examples can be drawn here, where two
Sri Lankan kings proactively reacted to aggressive religious persecutions
that they witnessed in their territories and rectified the situation
by providing safe abode for the victims. When the Dutch began to
persecute the Catholics, the Kandyan king gave abode to them in
the Kandyan kingdom. When Islam was threatened, the king settled
Muslims in Batticoloa. These two events provide evidence to prove
that Buddhists have not been prejudiced towards non-Buddhists. When
non-Buddhists were persecuted in Sri Lanka by foreign authorities,
Sri Lankan kings had taken an active role to shelter them and help
them to re-establish their religious communities.
In the name of the Buddha, Buddhists are obligated not to disturb,
ridicule or harass another religious practitioner or a secular person.
As inheritors of a peace-loving religion, we have an obligation
to minimize immense pains of humanity. Underprivileged, marginalized,
disadvantaged, and ethnic and religious minorities should be celebrated
in the hope of making their lives happier, healthier, and more wholesome.
Over two and a half millennia ago, the Buddha recognized the importance
of living, working, and cooperating with all human beings around
the Buddhist practitioner. Compassionate attitudes extended towards
others and non-violent values translated into positive mental, physical,
and social actions are extremely important for religious harmony
and social progress. Ones spirituality depends on and is enhanced
by a positive contribution of the other. A healthy, open, and conducive
environment in which Buddhist ideas and practices can be studied,
discussed, critiqued, and appropriated for positive human action
in the wider community is absolutely essential for a modern democracy
like Sri Lanka.
*See also Mahinda Deegalle, "Buddhist
Critical Attitudes for Postmodern Age," Buddhism for the New
Millennium, ed. Lakshman S. Perera et al (London: World Buddhist
Foundation, 2000), pp. 133-39.
Dr. Mahinda Deegalle
Study of Religions
School of Historical and Cultural Studies
Bath Spa University College
|