“Free to Choose, Open to Seek”:
Religious Liberty from a Theravada Buddhist Perspective
by Mahinda Deegalle

Buddhism celebrates liberty. In every sense of the word, liberty is the trademark of Buddhist doctrine, practices, and institutions in its long legacy of spread from India to the south to Sri Lanka, to the north to Tibet, to the east to China, and recently to the west to Europe and North America.

Buddhist doctrines discuss three forms of liberty: (i) liberty of thought, (ii) liberty of speech, and (iii) liberty of action. Among these three connected phases, “thought” or “conscience” is the driving force in the Buddhist conceptualization of liberty, since both speech and action are formed and shaped by initial thoughts and intentions of the human person. All three expressions—thought, speech, and action—need to be based on the basic principles of dhamma (law) in which one avoids any harmful impact on any sentient being.

Liberty in all sorts of human expression is encouraged and recognized because of the acceptance of individual variations, inclinations, preferences, and spiritual potential. Liberty is connected to and dependent upon particular social, religious, economic, historical, and doctrinal factors and ingredients. One’s liberation is often envisioned in the context of one’s subjectivity. In a profane sense, one can experience liberty in this world as freedom from various oppressions and exploitations, and in a sacred sense, when one attains to the status of the fully awakened one.

Though “religious” it is, Buddhist liberation, however, should not be viewed as completely disconnected with ethical, moral, and religious life in this world. Life in this messy world can be instrumental in leading one to the freedom from bondage.

The Buddhist vision of liberty is firmly grounded in its perception of “reality” as a penetrating comprehension of the things “as they are” in the world, that “all conditioned things are impermanent, subject to suffering and selfless.” The recognition of human liberty is an attempt to allow each individual to come to terms with the facts of life, which underpin our lives. A realistic penetration to the way things are in the world liberates each individual to be free from bondage that surrounds us by dragging us into various conflicts, acts of violence, and persecution in which one dispossesses another human person’s right to the free exercise of freedom.

Buddhism accepts individual variation. It adopts strategies that are suitable for each individual. Rather than imposing a totalitarian regime on each individual, Buddhism maintains that each individual should pursue an efficient course of action for one’s own liberation in one’s own phase.

The celebration of human freedom runs through Buddhist practices, institutions, and doctrines. Human beings are free to choose their own course of action for achieving liberation. Religious teachings should not prevent human beings from taking individual action for their liberation.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 1) asserts: “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.” The Buddhist view of human rights and religious liberty arises from the conviction that human beings are born with complete freedom and responsibility. The historical Buddha strongly affirmed that human beings have their destiny in their hands. Emphasizing self-reliance of each individual, human equality in dignity and rights is clearly recognized. Buddhist texts such as the Sampasadaniya Sutta (D.III.113) stress the importance of personal effort, human endeavour, strength, and responsibility. The Buddhahood itself is open to all human beings without any limitation.

The fundamental Buddhist ethical principle that underpins the concept of human rights is that “all life forms have a basic desire to safeguard themselves.” This ethical perspective gives validity and strength to the principle of universal love (metta) advocated by all Buddhists. Buddhist texts assert this crucial ethical standpoint in various ways: for example, the Dhammapada states that “all beings desire happiness” (10:3) and that “life is dear to all living beings” (10:2). This Buddhist ethical position further proposes to “compare one’s situation with that of another and avoid resorting to violence” and depriving another of its right to life. From this Buddhist perspective, the ideal life is one in which one lives “with friendliness and compassion towards all beings” (D.I.70).

As in many other world religions, there is no doubt that Buddhist teachings also can be drawn to support the view that religious liberty is firmly grounded on a conception of the dignity of the human person. In addition, however, Buddhist doctrines maintain that the free exercise of “will” is the key for both material and spiritual wellbeing of the human person who is “free to choose and open to seek” an individual programme of religious regiment that enables each individual to taste the pleasures of liberation.

 

Thus, Buddhism can be characterized as an eternal search for freedom. This recognition of human freedom forms the basis of Buddhist practice and ideology that shaped the cultures in Asia that came under Buddhist influence. The best illustration of this unconditional acceptance and recognition of liberty and human freedom is found in one of the most important Pali canonical discourses. In the Kalama Sutta (A.I.189), the Buddha advises Buddhists how they should design their religious enquiry by transcending any biases that come into play when human persons make critical decisions in adopting a religious tradition or practice. The historical Buddha advised the Kalamas (a group of critically-minded people) “not to accept anything on the grounds of revelation, tradition, or hearsay,” not to “accept because they are mentioned in the collections of the scriptures or because they are based on reasoning or because they are in accordance with logical arguments or because they conform with one’s own preconceived notions or because of inadequate reflection on them or because they fit to a context or because of the prestige of your teacher” (A.I.189).*] The historical Buddha’s provoking statement here is an illustration of religious freedom that the Buddha himself advocated in relation to his own teachings as well as those of other religious teachers.

This understanding of validity and acceptance of the other and tolerance towards non-Buddhist practices is not just an ideology invoked by Buddhists in public platform. Ideals shaped by these valuable religious insights have been translated into Buddhist practices and polities in pre-modern Sri Lanka. Two examples can be drawn here, where two Sri Lankan kings proactively reacted to aggressive religious persecutions that they witnessed in their territories and rectified the situation by providing safe abode for the victims. When the Dutch began to persecute the Catholics, the Kandyan king gave abode to them in the Kandyan kingdom. When Islam was threatened, the king settled Muslims in Batticoloa. These two events provide evidence to prove that Buddhists have not been prejudiced towards non-Buddhists. When non-Buddhists were persecuted in Sri Lanka by foreign authorities, Sri Lankan kings had taken an active role to shelter them and help them to re-establish their religious communities.

In the name of the Buddha, Buddhists are obligated not to disturb, ridicule or harass another religious practitioner or a secular person. As inheritors of a peace-loving religion, we have an obligation to minimize immense pains of humanity. Underprivileged, marginalized, disadvantaged, and ethnic and religious minorities should be celebrated in the hope of making their lives happier, healthier, and more wholesome. Over two and a half millennia ago, the Buddha recognized the importance of living, working, and cooperating with all human beings around the Buddhist practitioner. Compassionate attitudes extended towards others and non-violent values translated into positive mental, physical, and social actions are extremely important for religious harmony and social progress. One’s spirituality depends on and is enhanced by a positive contribution of the other. A healthy, open, and conducive environment in which Buddhist ideas and practices can be studied, discussed, critiqued, and appropriated for positive human action in the wider community is absolutely essential for a modern democracy like Sri Lanka.

*See also Mahinda Deegalle, "Buddhist Critical Attitudes for Postmodern Age," Buddhism for the New Millennium, ed. Lakshman S. Perera et al (London: World Buddhist Foundation, 2000), pp. 133-39.

Dr. Mahinda Deegalle
Study of Religions
School of Historical and Cultural Studies
Bath Spa University College